Philips BDM4350UC 43-Inch 4K Ultra HD Monitor Review and Specification

Advertisements
PHILIPS BDM4350UC 42.51″ 4K LED Monitor with VGA Port, HDMI Port,Display*2 Port Multi View, USB 3.0 Hub, MHL


Laptops may account for the majority of computer sales, but it’s hard to argue against the benefits of an enormous screen, especially once you need to juggle multiple apps at an equivalent time. A big, high-resolution display exposes possibilities that even the most important laptops cannot aim to match.

And they don’t come much bigger than the monitor we’ll be reviewing today. We’ve had the prospect to spend a couple of weeks using the Philips BDM4350UC, a 43-inch 4K LCD monitor, to ascertain whether a very big screen can turbocharge your productivity. Could this be the monitor of your dreams? it is time to seek out out.

Philips BDM4350UC design and specifications
Given its size, it’s no surprise that the Philips BDM4350UC resembles a television quite a standard monitor. In most cases, monitors — except ones with atypical aspect ratios — appear as if smaller televisions, but the very fact that the majority of them have stands that permit you adjust their position in ways in which televisions aren’t designed for.

But the Philips BDM4350UC looks a bit like any television of its size. In fact, installing this monitor involves fixing two legs stick out quite bit on either side of the monitor, a bit like we have seen with large-screen televisions by the likes of Xiaomi et al. . We did not have a table large enough to accommodate this monitor fixed to its legs, so we decided to go away them within the box.
Thankfully, the monitor remains stable enough to face on its own with none problems, and that is how we used it for the whole duration of our trial period . Though there is a slight tilt to the rear when it’s during this position, it’s definitely not as stable because it would be with the legs, and that we don’t advise using it like this call at the important world. With or without the legs, there is no thanks to adjust the peak of the monitor, nor does one have the choice to tilt or swivel the display in any way, which may be a little bit of a change from many popular standard-sized monitors.

The sheer size of this monitor are some things you will need to stay in mind before purchasing it, as physically, it’s going to not just be a plug-and-play replacement for, say, the 24-inch monitor you’re currently using. It does have a typical 200x200mm VESA mount for wall-mounting, or for a third-party VESA stand that would enable tilt and swivel adjustment that the monitor lacks by itself.
The bezels aren’t particularly large, but this is often no edge-to-edge monitor, and one could argue that it doesn’t got to be due to its sheer size. We never really noticed the bezels, probably because there was such a lot screen land occupying our field of view. the general design looks and feels premium, and this monitor is nothing like most of the budget televisions that we have seen recently.
A small plasticky piece jets out from the centre at rock bottom . This piece features a Philips logo and alittle LED that stays on without attracting any attention when the device is powered on, and strobes gently when it’s in standby mode.



All the ports are at the rear , on the left-hand side (as you reach backwards from the front) near rock bottom , apart from the facility inlet which is on the proper . You get two HDMI 2.0 ports (with MHL), two DisplayPort 1.2 ports, and a VGA port for input. Additionally, you get four USB 3.0 ports, one among which is listed to support “fast charging”, and a USB-in port to attach the monitor’s USB ports to your computer. Audio-in and audio-out (3.5mm) ports also are thrown certain good measure. As we noted, of these ports face outwards, which didn’t convince be a drag for us, but it’d be a priority if you would like to wall mount this monitor.

The panel measures 42.51 inches (108cm) diagonally, which allows Philips to plug this as a 43-inch monitor. The native resolution of 3840×2160 pixels is supported at up to 60Hz, with a claimed typical reaction time of 5ms. the height brightness is claimed to be 300 nits, with a typical contrast ratio of 1200:1. The panel doesn’t support HDR. There are two built-in speakers of 7W each, which seems like an honest idea in theory, and we’ll soon determine how they perform within the world .

The monitor also supports picture-in-picture (PIP) and picture-by-picture (PBP) modes that permit it display input from quite one device at an equivalent time. There are not any buttons at the front — there’s just one joystick-style button at the rear near rock bottom right that’s wont to control all settings. It takes some getting wont to the positioning and functioning of this button, but after a few of days with the monitor we were reaching out for it and adjusting settings blind with none problems. an influence button which will be flicked to show the monitor on or off is additionally located at the rear , though it isn’t as easy to succeed in .

Philips BDM4350UC performance

In this section, we’ll specialise in two main areas — the primary , how it’s to use a monitor of this size on a day-to-day basis, and therefore the impact it can wear your productivity. The second is that the performance of this panel itself, during which we’ll check out some benchmarks and other formal tests.

We connected the monitor to a Mac mini, and macOS defaulted to the native 4K resolution. We had no problems reading text and most other on-screen elements, so we didn’t bother cutting down to a lower resolution, though your mileage may vary. the sole UI elements that seemed a touch too tiny for our comfort were the menu bar near the highest right corner of the screen. Switching to 3200×1800 resolution resulted during a better experience.

With that said, we loved the additional pixels that the native resolution offers and switched back thereto in no time, deciding to measure with the slight discomfort of smaller menu bar icons. As you’d expect, the 4K panel at its native resolution gives you a huge amount of land , and as someone who’s constantly juggling multiple windows, we decided to form the foremost of it.

We dedicated one a part of the screen to our email client, another to the browser, one to Slack (our chat application), and another to Google Analytics, which we love keeping an eye fixed on in real time. We still had many land leftover for other windows. While it had been great having the ability to stay tabs on numerous applications at an equivalent time, we did notice some patterns in our usage.
Despite having all the extra pixels, we attended position the “main application” — i.e. whatever we were focussing on at the time — near the bottom-left of the screen. So, while the mail client’s message list window stayed on the top-left of the screen, we composed emails near the bottom-left (thankfully the macOS Mail app remembers the winndow’s position after you’ve dragged it once). We found that the highest half the display was largely useless for love or money aside from monitoring apps that need an occasional glance.

While the power to possess large documents display on the screen during a tall window sounds good in theory, we found that watching the highest one-third (at least, if not the highest half) of the screen for long requires an excessive amount of effort, and it almost seems like watching a movie from the front row. we expect that everybody will find yourself having “sweet spots” where most of the action takes place, with everything else within the periphery.

There are another problems that arose thanks to the quirks of macOS combined with our usage habits. Notifications from Mac apps show up within the upper-right corner of the screen, and this is often a behaviour that can’t be changed (other than disabling notifications altogether, of course). this suggests that if you’re focused on the bottom-left of the screen like us, it’s only too easy to miss notifications thanks to the sheer size of this display. Even once we did manage to catch them, then |every now and then”> sometimes it appeared like an excessive amount of effort to shift our attention to the highest right corner and then back again to what we were performing on .

We also booted into Windows on our Mac mini to ascertain what the experience was like. By default, Windows resorted to 300 percent scaling, but we switched to one hundred pc , and therefore the experience was pretty almost like what we noted with macOS above. Text was sharp — even at 8-point size — and therefore the overall experience was nothing like what you’d remember from hooking up your old, large-screen, non-4K TV to your computer a couple of years ago.

Of course to form the foremost of such a monitor, some people might got to change some habits. Many users who grew up using Windows are wont to maximising their current window and using Alt-Tab to modify between apps. If you’re someone who’s married thereto working style, unless you’re using apps like Photoshop or other pro-grade apps, you’re unlikely to urge much benefit out of a monitor of this size, and can likely see huge white (or black) bands on either side of your content.
Some of you would possibly be worried about eye strain related to using such an outsized display at relatively short distances. We didn’t experience any physical discomfort while using this monitor, but we’ve spent nearly every waking moment for the simplest a part of the last 30 years ahead of 1 screen or another, so we are probably not best suited to discuss the topic of eye strain and that we recommend getting an opinion from a licensed medical professional instead.

As we mentioned earlier, diving into the monitor’s settings requires you to succeed in around for the joystick-style button, but we got wont to it and therefore the menu layout pretty quickly. The settings allow you to control basic stuff just like the current input source, the image format (widescreen, 4:3, or 1:1, though the latter appeared to haven’t any effect and mimicked widescreen), colour temperature, gamma correction, brightness, contrast, and just about everything else you would possibly expect (see images below).
Our favourite a part of the settings panel was the one associated with PIP and PBP. the previous gives you an inset that takes over a neighborhood of the screen. you’ll select which source gets to be the most input, and which gets to be the inset. you’ll customise its position(top-left, bottom-left, bottom-right, top-right) also as size (small, medium, large), with the inset taking up a touch but 1 / 4 of the screen at its largest size.

We found this to be useful while, say, performing on the most screen while having an Apple TV connected so we could follow a match while continuing to figure . Yes, you’ll easily do that by having Hotstar open during a browser window on your machine, and both ways have their advantages and drawbacks .

We appreciated the power to use the Apple TV remote to regulate the video we were watching without interrupting what we were performing on , though the disadvantage is that we couldn’t control the precise positioning of the inset, the way you’d a window on your computer. which suggests it can find yourself covering important on-screen elements. We wish there was how to use the joystick to position the inset exactly where one wants.

PBP allows you to position two, three, or four sources side by side, with none overlap. This didn’t appeal to us tons , but your mileage may vary. it is a nice thanks to have, say, an equivalent computer and Apple TV running side by side so one doesn’t get within the way of the opposite . to urge the foremost out of this mode, it is best to possess the resolution of your computer set to 1080p, as each input in PBP mode is being rendered in full-HD resolution.

In the PassMark MonitorTest Master Screen, running at native 4K resolution within the 16:9 ratio, the highest left grille with a pixel spacing of 1 pixel appeared as a consistent grey colour rather than individual black pixel lines. We switched to 4:3 and will then see the individual lines. However, the centre circle which is predicted to be a circle at 4:3 was more of an oval, while it seemed to be an ideal circle at 16:9. the other happened with the four smaller circles within the corners. We didn’t notice any blurring or smearing within the six coloured squares near the centre. Everything else on the screen was needless to say also .

The solid colour screens of the benchmark appeared fine, as did the size Black-Red and Black-Blue screens, though the size Black-Green appeared as a series of distinct vertical green lines of various shades, rather than one smooth gradient like within the other screens. within the Gamma Red, Green, and Blue tests, we noticed that the oblong bar faded into the background at Gamma level 1.16. within the Fonts Test, the 6-point text was almost readable, with individual characters as distinct as we could expect them to be.

In the browser-based Eizo test, we noticed issues almost like PassMark on the opening screen, with the squares appearing as individual black and white lines in 4:3 resolution, but as a gray square at 16:9. We didn’t notice any defective pixels in any of the colors . within the uniformity test, we noticed that at 25 percent grey, the proper half the screen was brighter than the left, especially closer to the sting .

The monitor fared rather well within the colour distances test, which suggests it can sufficiently differentiate between colours that are similar. Our colour gradients tests reported similar results to PassMark, with green being the sole one that stood out as a touch bit odd.

The Philips BDM4350UC excelled within the text sharpness test, with both White on Black and Black on White scenarios. However, the viewing angles test didn’t go also , with noticeable changes within the sizes of the circles on screen as viewing angles increased. thereupon said, we didn’t notice significant degradation in quality when viewing content from odd angles in day-to-day usage. Eizo’s Gamma test indicated a worth of two .4.

We also spent a substantial amount of your time using the monitor as a television, with a 4K Apple TV and an ACT Stream TV 4K media player connected thereto . The monitor fared surprisingly well during this setup. Powering off the media player puts the monitor in standby mode, so we didn’t got to twiddle the facility switch. Power on a media player, and therefore the monitor automatically switches the source thereto input. The ACT Stream TV 4K media player has volume controls of its own, so we didn’t miss having a TV remote in the least when using this as our video source.
The built-in speakers on the Philips BDM4350UC get loud enough to fill an outsized bedroom, and altogether the time we spent with this monitor, we recall only one occasion once we wished they could’ve been louder, which could just be right down to a poorly mixed show. Sound quality is sweet , and while there is no real bass to talk of, the speakers are ok to allow you to use this monitor as a standalone TV. you will not need dedicated external speakers, though the audio-out port means you’ll do exactly that if necessary.

As far as picture quality cares , watching both HD and 4K content was pretty enjoyable, and while we did not have any complaints about the brightness of the panel, we did wish sometimes that the contrast ratio was a touch bit better. In completely dark scenes, we also noticed a touch of “IPS Glow, especially near the proper edge, though it wasn’t particularly bad. During the day, we found the glossy panel to be a touch too reflective sometimes , specifically when using the device as a television from a distance, though this wasn’t really a problem once we were sitting up close and using this it a monitor connected to our PC.

With a claimed reaction time of 5ms — and thanks to the very fact that the majority PC graphics cards can’t drive 4K panels at their native resolution while offering consistent 60fps — this monitor isn’t targeted at gamers, so we didn’t run any formal gaming benchmarks. thereupon said, we did connect our Xbox to the monitor for a touch of gaming, and that we were satisfied with the experience.

Verdict

There’s a lot to love about the Philips BDM4350UC. A 4K panel has the potential to greatly enhance your productivity, and this monitor delivers on just about everything it promises. Despite a couple of minor quirks, we didn’t find any major performance issues, and were quite satisfied with the general experience. Creative professionals et al. who can put the additional land to use will love what this monitor has got to offer. we will also see this monitor being put to use in conference rooms as a high-resolution, all-purpose replacement for a projector, or on an office wall where the PIP/ PBP features are often wont to display multiple sources directly .

However, as our time with the device showed, not everyone are going to be ready to make the foremost of the additional pixels, and it is easy to ascertain in hindsight why many prefer using multiple regular-sized monitors next to every other rather than one giant 43-inch panel. Using such an outsized display as a monitor is not practical and it’s easier to develop blind — or a minimum of “non-preferred” — spots than when employing a multi-monitor setup, as was the case in our usage.
With that said, if you’re trying to find an enormous monitor that also doubles up as a television, the Philips BDM4350UC may be a great bet. the maximum amount as we loved the PIP feature, even without that this monitor does an excellent job of being a television substitute, because of the great built-in speakers. beat all, we expect this monitor are going to be an excellent addition to any headquarters where this type of versatility might be particularly useful.

Prize: 49,999/-

Pros

Decent overall performance
Plenty of inputs
4 USB 3.0 ports
Built-in speakers are good
Useful PIP and PBP features
Doubles up as a nice TV

Cons

Big panels aren’t great for all use cases
Contrast ratio could be better
Can be a bit too reflective at times
Product information of PHILIPS BDM4350UC

Technical Details
Brand
PHILIPS
Colour
Black
Item Height
56.2 Centimeters
Item Width
8.2 Centimeters
Screen Size
42.51 Inches
Maximum Display Resolution
3840 x 2160 (4K UHD)
Item Weight
9.4 Kg
Product Dimensions
96.8 x 8.2 x 56.2 cm
Item model number
BDM4350UC/94
Number of HDMI Ports
2
Number of Audio-out Ports
1
Number of VGA Ports
1
Wattage
63.1 Watts
Included Components
Monitor,VGA Cable, HDMI Cable, Power Cable,DP Cable, Audio Cable, User Guide, Manuals
Warranty & Support
Warranty Details: 3 Year On Site from date of purchase

Leave a Reply